

And all the photos look like shit because they’ve been recompressed in JPEG, and all the metadata is just gone.
And all the photos look like shit because they’ve been recompressed in JPEG, and all the metadata is just gone.
.order(created_at: :desc)
I don’t have a point, but felt like typing it in Ruby. Maybe someone else will have something snarky to say.
I don’t know why but this makes me picture some dusty old-school newsroom with that one guy in all the TV shows smoking a cigar acting kind of like an asshole, and he looks up from the rough draft and while pointing at it with the cigar half-yells “have ChatGPT take a crack at it, maybe it’ll spice things up!”
But you can do all that without selling out your users to third parties.
As a web developer that blocks all this shit, that’s the line I always use. I would just use first-party analytics from the same domain the website is hosted from. The added bonus is that people like me wouldn’t even be able to block it without blocking the entire website (at least with DNS).
This is why I’m such a cunt about blocking this stuff at the DNS and/or IP level. Google Analytics is essentially everywhere including IRS web pages with your Social Security number in the DOM.
For that price I might as well get a used desktop or another mini PC.
It does matter to me and I live in an area with frequent power outages. Unfortunately I didn’t check this out before purchasing so I’m pretty annoyed by this behavior.
Why is this even being covered?
That is sad to see. I’ve moved on to Raspberry Pi + hard disk enclosure (with incredible performance) but it’s still upsetting to see Synology go this route.
to try to* ban it
Ohh AVIF, fancy schmancy
Just did a whole routine to check the link for UTM parameters. 😭 (It links to the bare domain.)
Such an original, Reddit-style one liner. 😒