atro_city

Unless they are huge and ultra-wide, I don’t see the point. They don’t add anything at small sizes except a certain aesthetic. At large sizes, it’s a quality of life improvement as things on the edges are closer than with flat screens. They were more expensive when I looked for them, so test it for the 14-30 day return period and see if you actually like it.

One could argue it’s a meme.

Why do people make rhetorical comments?

No, it’s not. It’s based on these two things

• Swiping Right on Data: Analyzing the Trends of Tinder
• Tinder Experiments II: Guys, unless you are really hot you are probably better off not wasting your time on Tinder — a quantitative socio-economic study

The latter especially has this widely-misquoted line:

It was determined that the bottom 80% of men (in terms of attractiveness) are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men.

Many people understood it as “80% of women go for 20% of guys”, but that’s not what it’s saying.

If you also look at the first article, it has many graphs which speak for themselves

The reverse reason is also that the pink blobs will receive arrows from all of the blue blobs. Blue blobs just reduce their market value that way.

The US Americans. Pretty sure the rest of America doesn’t have crazy egg prices, right?