• Euphoma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    This shouldn’t be surprising to anyone. The only thing meta cares about is money

  • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    3 days ago

    “national security”. On Facebook. Okay guys. A better title would be "Zuck offered to completely legally sell their data (yes it’s their’s , read the ToS) to China in a completely legal bid to gain entry into China. It’s not even alleged that he broke any laws.

    The real problem is that the US doesn’t have any digital data privacy laws, so ToSs for these services can contain whatever the host wants, and they can do whatever they want with the data. But that will never happen.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      3 days ago

      Bingo.

      The idea that CEO’s will put morals over profits is hopelessly naive.

      If you want companies to act morally, you need to implement legislation and be willing to enforce that legislation. And not small million dollar fines, serious fines like 10% of revenue and personal liability and even jail time for executives.

      But the American public only cares about having the stock market go up. They don’t care about their data.

    • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      So the exact same reason they tried to ban tiktok…except this one actually happened.

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Doesn’t matter at this point. He’ll pay Trump another 1 million dollars and this news will simply vanish.

    • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      Tiktok is considered a National Security threat that must be banned because it will give our data to China. Let’s see if Zucc faces absolutely any consequences. I won’t hold my breath

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Very first thought was “surely that’s treason”.

      I must look up the legal definition.