• YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Just because there are other distribution channels doesn’t mean that valve doesn’t have that market stitched up. Their profitability is a function of being a monopoly. It isn’t like their client or anything is revolutionary.

      • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I disagree as their client is the most feature rich one available and it’s not Valve’s fault that the competition shoots itself in the foot too often. Show me one example where Valve bought out competitor stores.

        • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          They’re monopoly only because all of their competitors fail to capture the audience. You might as well say Water is monopolizing hydration.