LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWho remembers this? piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square486fedilinkarrow-up1802
arrow-up1802imageWho remembers this? piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square486fedilink
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoThe front of it presumably is. But the back, that we’re looking at, seems to be in shade.
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoLight bounces around. That’s the whole point of ray tracing. Even if the dress were not in direct light, the light bouncing around the environment would prevent the kind of shade necessary for that.
The front of it presumably is. But the back, that we’re looking at, seems to be in shade.
Light bounces around. That’s the whole point of ray tracing. Even if the dress were not in direct light, the light bouncing around the environment would prevent the kind of shade necessary for that.