The end of an ad-free WhatsApp.

WhatsApp is rolling out ads. In an update on Monday, Meta announced that it will now show ads from businesses through its Stories-like status feature.

Meta says it will tailor the ads to your interests by using “limited” information, including your country or city, language, the channels you follow, and how you interact with ads on the platform. You can also change your ad preferences from Meta’s Accounts Center.

This isn’t the only change Meta is making to WhatsApp. The company will also start showing promoted channels when you click on the Explore button to find new ones to follow. It’s also rolling out the ability to subscribe to channels to “receive exclusive updates” as well.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.worldEnglish
    9·
    1 day ago

    Nothing better than having a private conversation with my friends and having some dude lean in to remind us that Brawndo, the thirst mutilator, has electrolytes.

    • lmuel@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      2·
      1 day ago

      Same in Germany.

      I do believe it’s better than using iMessage for example but it’s undoubtedly rubbish.

    • jabjoe@feddit.ukEnglish
      2·
      1 day ago

      Same here in UK. So many people think of it like email. A universal communication system. They can’t see the problem with it being a single, closed, for profit, provider. Now Meta feels people are locked in, they will be finding out. But they still won’t see the problem until it ratcheted to really bad. Like frogs in boiling water.

  • dsilverz@friendica.world
    21·
    2 days ago

    @MazonnaCara89 The country I live in (Brazil) overly uses and depends on WhatsApp. From government departments to businesses and transactional relations, all the way to social and family affairs, people is addicted to it, forcing other people (e.g. me) to either have a WhatsApp account or ending up far beyond mere social ostracism (beyond mere loneliness): effectively, the inability to buy, sell, rent or even resolve citizen matters with certain government/state departments (such as receiving medical appointment schedules from Brazilian’s public health system (Sistema Unico de Saude/SUS (Unified Health System) via their “postinhos”/“Unidades Basicas de Saude” (neighborhood public health centers)). They don’t even use the grand old phone calling and SMS anymore: even “calls”, when performed, are made by people/departments/businesses via Whatsapp VoIP functionality.

    That said, it’s worth mentioning that WhatsApp has been running ads for a long time: the “Channels” section lists seemingly random “channels”, many of which are businesses with “verified” “blue badges”. So it’s effectively advertisement disguised as veiled “recommendations” from Meta. It seems like it’ll just become worse (to the surprise of no one who understands what Meta is).

    I really want to leave WhatsApp, but I’m socially compelled to stay (it’s the only mainstream platform where I still have an account, against my will)… the raw, grotesque distillation from social compliance, worse than depicted in Derren Brown’s documentaries…

    • dsilverz@friendica.world
      0·
      14 hours ago

      @MazonnaCara89 @Excrubulent I’m unable to reply your reply directly (for some reason, the Friendica instance I use can’t see the Lemmy instance you’re in; I’m suspecting it’s because Solarpunk instance uses Anubis CAPTCHA and Friendica could be operating in a different manner from how Lemmy operates hence triggering Anubis for a server-to-server communication, but I’m not sure).

      I’m replying through this reply to my reply.

      Facebook has had a strategy for a long time of monopolising the internet of countries that previously had very little internet. They essentially subsidise internet infrastructure and make that subsidy dependent on facebook being a central part of the network.

      Exactly. And many carrier operators over here (Tim, Claro, Vivo) offer “rate-less access” (i.e. won’t count as consumed bytes) to Facebook, WhatsApp, among other mainstream platforms (sometimes TikTok).
      Also, there are “Captive portals” (web-based Wi-Fi authentication for passwordless Wi-Fi networks) from many “free Wi-Fi hotspots” out there which uses “Facebook login” as a means of getting accessing to their “free Wi-Fi”. Facebook (and, by extension, Meta and its platforms) is deeply ingrained into Brazilian’s daily lives and I’m frequently told to “have a Facebook profile” for me, it’s deeply annoying.

      They obviously have found ways to inveigle themselves into key infrastructure in lots of places, even if they couldn’t build it in from the ground up.

      Exactly!

      @joel_feila:

      jesus that some dystopian shit

      Yeah… it’s a deeply boring dystopian world. The world has been indistinguishable from Cyberpunk.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.netEnglish
      2·
      1 day ago

      Facebook has had a strategy for a long time of monopolising the internet of countries that previously had very little internet. They essentially subsidise internet infrastructure and make that subsidy dependent on facebook being a central part of the network.

      So I’m not surprised to hear this. They obviously have found ways to inveigle themselves into key infrastructure in lots of places, even if they couldn’t build it in from the ground up.

  • rustydomino@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    1 day ago

    The problem is there are very few alternatives that will work for grandma and her friends, especially open source alternatives. This is why WhatsApp and LINE are stupidly popular.

      • rustydomino@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        1 day ago

        Awful depends on your point of view. Is it easy to message and call your friends and make group chats for free? The answer is yes. The fact that the interface sucks and is ad-ridden is irrelevant to older aunties and uncles.

  • Auth@lemmy.worldEnglish
    55·
    2 days ago

    • provide free app at a loss

    • grow massive user base and market share

    • squeeze your userbase for every cent they’re worth

    Every single time. We got to solve the funding issue some how, I dont want to live in a future run by ads.

    • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      2 days ago

      WhatsApp was charging $1-$3 per year before Facebook’s acquisition. They had 600M+ users and a team of twelve people. It was beautiful while it lasted.

      Hopefully we can carry out the original mission with Signal.

    • bonjour@mander.xyzEnglish
      15·
      2 days ago

      WhatsApp was not free and already had a massive user base before Facebook bought it.

      Hope this will turn people to alternatives.

    • Susurrus@lemm.eeEnglish
      10·
      2 days ago

      It’s not very easy to solve the issue of infinite growth in a world with finite resources. The fundamental issue is that it’s just not physically possible, but they keep trying. Either we continue this cycle and eventually destroy the planet irreversibly, or we acknowledge that maybe money isn’t everything, and that maybe [the vast majority of] people aren’t inherently egoitistical monsters, and we move on to different systems.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      2·
      2 days ago

      It’s not just the funding, it’s the business overall. Public companies need to show growing revenues year to year, and worse: growing revenues with a minimum yield. A product can grow by attracting more users up to a certain point. Then the only way to grow is by making more money out of the same users base. If the revenue is based on ads:

      • Extend the product so that the user’s engagement increases (channels/others kind).
      • Add paying features (freemium approach, that includes blue stars or whatever the hell you want it to look like…)
      • Serve them ads

      Freemium is not always working well and Meta never used it. They have no new great idea to extend the product without eating their other products users bases. So the only one left is more ads.

      Funding is not the issue, for-profit companies are. Non-profit is the way to go. Federation is even better as individuals/families/small organizations can run their own servers.-

      • Auth@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        2 days ago

        I dont think its for profit being the issue. Companies making a profit is fine. Its publicly traded companies giving bad incentives.

    • hansolo@lemmy.todayEnglish
      4·
      2 days ago

      Eastern Europe loves the app Viber that Rakuten bought, which has had ads for years.

      People LOVE a walled garden of their friends are there, too.

  • Mark@lemmy.worldEnglish
    114·
    3 days ago

    “We will never show you ads in WhatsApp. We promise”. --Facebook when they bought WhatsApp and promised the previous owner not to force ads in the app…

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.worldEnglish
    15·
    2 days ago

    the channels you follow

    I knew they would use that info for targeted advertising

    It’s Facebook 101, let the users themselves tell you what they like

  • ☂️-@lemmy.mlEnglish
    9·
    2 days ago

    i use none of these features.

    i’m glad they are not as invasive as i thought, but they will definetly be making them worse over time.