dwazou@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agoPaul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square327fedilinkarrow-up1939
arrow-up1939external-linkPaul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. www.theguardian.comdwazou@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agomessage-square327fedilink
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up46·2 days agoSo abolish copyright law entirely instead of only allowing theft when capitalists do it.
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 days agoThat is definitely one of the most cooked takes I’ve heard in a while. Why would anyone create anything if it can immediately be copied with no compensation to you?
minus-square100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoI don’t see how allowing AI robbery barons to steal copyrighted material would benefit a small fish in the pond of IP
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoAnd I can buy groceries with thoughts and prayers.
minus-squaregodownloadacar@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoMaybe you can download them. Apparently download is theft
minus-squarethewedtdeservedit@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoDo you make any money out of copyrights?
minus-squareScrollone@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 days agoI think copyright should last maximum 10 years. Plenty of time to earn enough from your creation. Imagine how advanced we would be, as a civilization, if everything created before 2015 was free for everybody.
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoHonestly, I think our world would be a lot blander, and we’d have a whole lot less original content.
minus-squarethewedtdeservedit@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoYou probably only consume Hollywood prechewed crap and universal soup they call “music”
minus-squareVespair@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-22 days agoYou know that for the vast majority of human history copyright didn’t exist, and yet people still created art and culture, right? edit: If you’re gonna downvote, have the balls to explain how I’m wrong.
minus-squareAux@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoThe original copyright law was created to protect authors from publishers. The current law is an abomination and should be removed.
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoYou’re probably right, but saying we should abolish it altogether is insane. There’s a good reason we have these laws.
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoReally? Artists getting paid for their work isn’t a good reason?
minus-squaregodownloadacar@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 day agoArTistS gettiNg paId (after universal gets a 40% cuts because you used the snare sample from Taylor swift ofc)
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 hours agoSo what’s the alternative? How else would a professional artist make a living?
minus-squareAux@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoYou don’t need a copyright for that. Copyright doesn’t pay anyone anything.
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 hours agoI genuinely feel like I’m talking to a wall here.
minus-squareAux@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours agoThat’s because you don’t understand what copyright legally is.
minus-squarethewedtdeservedit@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoExactly. Paul Mc Cartney have been trained on copyrighted material and should give his money back to the majors
So abolish copyright law entirely instead of only allowing theft when capitalists do it.
That is definitely one of the most cooked takes I’ve heard in a while.
Why would anyone create anything if it can immediately be copied with no compensation to you?
I don’t see how allowing AI robbery barons to steal copyrighted material would benefit a small fish in the pond of IP
Creation is its own incentive.
And I can buy groceries with thoughts and prayers.
Maybe you can download them. Apparently download is theft
Do you make any money out of copyrights?
I think copyright should last maximum 10 years. Plenty of time to earn enough from your creation.
Imagine how advanced we would be, as a civilization, if everything created before 2015 was free for everybody.
Honestly, I think our world would be a lot blander, and we’d have a whole lot less original content.
You probably only consume Hollywood prechewed crap and universal soup they call “music”
You know that for the vast majority of human history copyright didn’t exist, and yet people still created art and culture, right?
edit: If you’re gonna downvote, have the balls to explain how I’m wrong.
The original copyright law was created to protect authors from publishers. The current law is an abomination and should be removed.
You’re probably right, but saying we should abolish it altogether is insane. There’s a good reason we have these laws.
There are no good reasons.
Really? Artists getting paid for their work isn’t a good reason?
ArTistS gettiNg paId (after universal gets a 40% cuts because you used the snare sample from Taylor swift ofc)
So what’s the alternative? How else would a professional artist make a living?
You don’t need a copyright for that. Copyright doesn’t pay anyone anything.
I genuinely feel like I’m talking to a wall here.
That’s because you don’t understand what copyright legally is.
Exactly. Paul Mc Cartney have been trained on copyrighted material and should give his money back to the majors