Brothers-in-law use construction knowledge to compete against Comcast in Michigan.

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 days ago

      If they expand then they’ll end up just another evil corporate ISP, and/or if they start getting large enough one of the other ISPs will buy them up.

      They don’t need to expand, there just needs to be many more small, ultra local providers.

        • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          To be fair, in 1996 both the Senate and the House were controlled by republicans, those the bill passed both chambers by an overwhelmingly bipartisan majority. Even if Clinton wanted to veto the bill, Congress would have still been able to push it through.

          • HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            I know. Isn’t great? When there’s no party in true “control” then whoever wants to think it’s the other guy’s fault can easily do so.

            I was already an adult in 1996. It was definitely a bipartisan thing. Despite many tech insiders warning how it would cause the exact opposite of what it was intended to do, Clinton didn’t just sign it. He and Al Gore, for years, claimed it as their own.

            Hell, it was this exact act Al Gore was referring to when he claimed he “invented” the Internet.