• Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 day ago

    They literally don’t generate any revenue. Wikipedia is quite literally the definition of a non-profit.

    Also, trump is barred from running non-profits due to fraud in NY, I feel like that should disqualify him from making these kinds of decisions.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wikipedia, archive.org, and any similar essential services ought to be migrating their hosting and organizational headquarters to outside the US ASAP.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That’s not something you can just do. All of there employees are Americans.

      It would be better if they were spread across many countries so that one place couldn’t cause a problem.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No need

      Install the free offline reader software from here

      https://kiwix.org/en/

      Then grab what content you want from https://dumps.wikimedia.org/kiwix/zim/

      Here’s English Wikipedia, with pictures from 2024 https://dumps.wikimedia.org/kiwix/zim/wikipedia/)wikipedia_en_all_maxi_2024-01.zim

      names with maxi have all the pictures names with mini few pictures and abridged content names with nopic have no pictures and abridged content

      if it says science or basketball, it’s just things flagged as science or things flagged as basketball.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Just started, great suggestion.

      I can’t believe this shit. 2023 me wouldn’t believe I’d be doing half of the things I’m doing now.

      • 7toed@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Just wait til 2025 you couldn’t possibly believe what '27’s got in stock :p

        Though, any server schenanagins That may interest me for some hypotheical good in the world?

    • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      Got my snapshot from Jan.

      It’s only 20gb.

      You need an offline viewer. That’s a snap /flat hub install. Kiwix I believe

        • yonderer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yes, they’re are different versions. Maxi is the 110GB one, there is also a nopic version that is quite a bit lighter.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago
        1. It would allow multiple definitions for words (not eveyone agrees with what certain words mean)
        2. It would allow some instances to focus on being apolitical or more political.
        3. It would allow all wikis to be condenced into one platform (including possibly wikis like the Arch Wiki)
        4. It would help combat censorship
        • HenryBenry@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The reason Wikipedia is so good is because they are forced to use the most correct words.

        • goldenbug@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          23 hours ago

          For number one, there are articles that express different voices around a topic. Definitions often have multiple sections to express different voicws. Do they not?

          I think a political project is a different beast from wikipedia. There will be some biases but not as its grounding purpose.

          The consensus is somehow already constructed by the current set up. Most people just don’t (and my feeling is that will and should not, like in the case of vaccine scienxe) participate.

          Censorship of which kind, though?

        • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I liked the idea in your first comment but all your reasonings for it are backward.

    • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re pretty flush with cash still. Trump can go after them, but for what? They’d need more corruption than they have in the judicial system today. They’ll get there eventually, but they don’t have it yet.

  • yet_another_commie@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Wikipedia has always been a right wing propaganda outlet. Libbiest among the supergigalibs. What is this post even talking about? I wish N4zipedia shuts down

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    To be fair it is a little left leaning and the editors sometime massive jerks.

    However, it really isn’t bad at all. They do a pretty decent job of publishing factual information and Wikipedia is useful to a lot of people. Even if it was publishing propaganda they would still be protected under free speech. There are way more sketchy non profits than Wikipedia. It is kind of scaring that it is now a target

      • m532@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Liberalism isnt based on reality, its constantly wrong. Only science is based on reality.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        It really doesn’t

        Bias is a truly human thing. It comes from applying emotions to facts. In reality there are no right answers and thus everything will always be biased.

  • lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The media manipulation information warfare department has virtually unlimited funds and anyone who steps out of line and questions the narrative gets the banhammer. That’s why they went after TikTok.